Print Page | Close Window

Orchestra members pay

Printed From: Community Theater Green Room
Category: Producing Theater
Forum Name: Other Topics
Forum Discription: For everything else
URL: http://www.communitytheater.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4452
Printed Date: 11/23/24 at 3:25pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 8.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Orchestra members pay
Posted By: Stagefryte
Subject: Orchestra members pay
Date Posted: 2/03/10 at 9:16am
Hi.  This may be stepping on sacred ground, but I'd like to ask what other community theater organizations are paying their orchestra members. 
 
We have our orchestra members on site and playing for four rehearsals and one open dress during production week, and nine performances (14 "shows" total).  We do not pay high school students, but do pay college students and "adults."  Our per show payment is $20.00 per orchestra member. 
 
Are we in the ball park?  We're in western Pennsylvania.  Thanks!



Replies:
Posted By: Gaafa
Date Posted: 2/03/10 at 8:43pm
G'day Neal
We rearly use muso's as such but  this site AACT topic may help?
http://www.aact.org/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1264992276/1#1 - http://www.aact.org/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1264992276/1#1


-------------
      Joe
Western Gondawandaland
turn right @ Perth.
Hear the light & see the sound.
Toi Toi Toi Chookas {{"chook [chicken] it is"}
May you always play
to a full house}



Posted By: Stagefryte
Date Posted: 2/11/10 at 4:40pm
Thanks for the post and recommendation!
 
G'Day,
~neal


Posted By: JoeMc
Date Posted: 4/25/10 at 7:31pm
Who would want to be a muso at theses stage hands pay;_

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=email_en&sid=a0oxw90zC9Wc - http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=ema...id=a0oxw90zC9Wc
But as it has been suggested on other forums, unless your great gandfather was a member of this 'Local', forget about trying to jion up.



-------------
[western] Gondawandaland
"Hear the light & see the sound!
TOI TOI CHOOKAS
{may you always play to a full house!}


Posted By: TonyDi
Date Posted: 4/26/10 at 7:31am

Try this link as well.  Varies so much that to define it is futile. Depends on the market, the pool of available musicians and so forth, budgets, unions, etc., etc.  But this link might add some info to your arsenal.

http://www.communitytheater.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4452 - http://www.communitytheater.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4452

 

TonyDi



-------------
"Almost famous"


Posted By: gelcat
Date Posted: 4/26/10 at 11:42am
it all very much depends on your budget and your area. 
We are all volunteer except for 1 and 1/2 employees (overall technical director/designer/venue manager and bookkeeper).  The orchestra for our current show is invited to all the cast parties and are welcome to come graze on the munchie offerings that this show's cast provides. (the food situation varies show to show by the participants involved) That, a job well done, and our eternal thanks is their reward for their time and talents. 
 
If we had the budget, we would love to pay people.  This theatre has never had that. 


-------------
www.actorsguildonline.org
Actors Guild of Parkersburg
Parkersburg, WV


Posted By: JoeMc
Date Posted: 4/26/10 at 9:07pm
What amases me with Bloombeg link is the amount that stage crew are paid, which I suppose could only happen in NY, of $350 000/year + for doing props?
Me thinks there is more at work thsn just being in a Union?


-------------
[western] Gondawandaland
"Hear the light & see the sound!
TOI TOI CHOOKAS
{may you always play to a full house!}


Posted By: SamD
Date Posted: 4/26/10 at 10:07pm
We usually set a budget for our music director of $1,400.00. We leave it up to them to find and pay the musicians as they see fit. This is for 6 shows. We have found, with the economy the way it is, that it's getting harder and harder to find anyone to take the job!


Posted By: TonyDi
Date Posted: 4/27/10 at 7:17am
I know it's the bane of professional musician's existence....(can you say even the demise of live orchs and available musicians) AND it's also scary and very under-used - yea, even loathed by some....but I saw a performance of Les Mis come through with two percussionists, the orchestra conducter and 6 keyboard players.  Then too, I know a few of the Phantom Of The Opera offerings on tour used a LOT of pre-recorded tracks to accomplish a full blown musical. I've even done it numerous times as well. A lot of actors don't like it. I can see why - there are some pitfalls for some people.  BUT it's there from the beginning, from rehearsals all the way through every performance, it CAN be parsed out to individual soloists for home practice and such, it's always on time, it never asks for coffee (or union) breaks, it's always in tune, it CAN be adjusted to whatever tempo, key or nuance your singers need or could ever want - and while a bit expensive, doesn't come close in most cases to what you'd have to pay a 20 - 40 piece orchestra - much less even a small half dozen piece band.
 
I'm an advocate of backing tracks but I TOO love the immediacy, the lush richness of a real orchestra with players expending their air to accomplish good sound.  BUT I also realize the limitations of that for a LOT of people and company's budgets. Just too hard to afford live musicians and finding them too - when the pool is so shallow with players who want to earn a few bucks, have some fun, and be appreciated for what they bring to a musical.  So I used tracks - which I sequenced by the way at great expenditure of time - and most of the casts I've used - save the one or two dissenters - loved using them. I mean, yeah, it's theater Karaoke - but it's a useful tool.  The only viable reason any of the dissenting actors who didn't like it, could come up with, was that if they messed up at least live musicians could hopefully follow and get you back on track (or not).  My contention is that actors who do musicals (or any show for that matter) should know their lines, lyrics, melodies, parts or whatever and using tracks is unforgiving....you HAVE to know it cold. THAT was the only argument that they had though - live musicians could CYA!!
 
ANYway, if you're going to do musicals, then it's the nature of the beast that you're going to have to have the budget to cover things regular shows do not require.  Planning well ahead, fund raising or whatever it takes - is the order of the day in those cases...unless you're a wealthy theater company (haven't ever been connected to too many of those) and have a nice reserve to employ.
 
TonyDi


-------------
"Almost famous"


Posted By: David McCall
Date Posted: 4/27/10 at 9:59pm
Tracks have volume controls :-)
Many musicians do not, or it is broken :-(
Either you get too loud, or much too loud. 
 
However, we just did Sound of Music with about 40 musicians on the floor in front of the stage. Only 2 actors had wireless and everybody else had to get by with PCCs on the edge of the apron. Every actor that spoke up and spoke clearly could easily be heard. I was quite impressed.  I don't have any idea what they were paid.


-------------
David M


Posted By: Spectrum
Date Posted: 4/28/10 at 2:20am
I know some people see musical performers as 'sacred cows' but I'll NEVER understand why some musicians don't see it as the actors and crew people see it.  They volunteer their time and talents as a way to practice their craft and express their creativity, all for the good of the public and the theatre.  I know when I post the musicians names on the web site I maintain for MY favorite community theatre, I place them on the same page as the actors, because they are all PERFORMERS.  Why should THEY get paid when no one else does?  People are going to kill off everything good about 'community' if they make greed, ego, or personal gain the priority.

-------------
Growing old is mandatory. Growing up is optional.


Posted By: Phlufster
Date Posted: 5/01/10 at 12:05am
We pay $50 per musician. This includes rehearsals and 4-5 performances. We are a community theater in a town of about 4,000.


Posted By: redhead
Date Posted: 6/17/10 at 5:16pm
I'm not sure what "the norm" is or should be, but within the last 12 months, I played for three shows (and two weeks of rehearsals) for a high school production of "Wizard of Oz" and was paid a total of $400.

I was told on a piano forum that this was VERY low pay for accompanying a high school musical; that typically pay at closer to a thousand dollars.

I also played for a community theatre production of "Godspell." The show was actually picked up by another theatre, so I was paid in two installments. It totaled nine performances and at least as many rehearsals. I was paid a total of $900 for all of it.

Redhead


Posted By: Helena
Date Posted: 7/20/10 at 10:34am
Originally posted by Spectrum

I know some people see musical performers as 'sacred cows' but I'll NEVER understand why some musicians don't see it as the actors and crew people see it.  They volunteer their time and talents as a way to practice their craft and express their creativity, all for the good of the public and the theatre.  I know when I post the musicians names on the web site I maintain for MY favorite community theatre, I place them on the same page as the actors, because they are all PERFORMERS.  Why should THEY get paid when no one else does?  People are going to kill off everything good about 'community' if they make greed, ego, or personal gain the priority.
 
I agree with this statement.  I have had leads in many of our musicals.  I have also been vocal director a few times, I've directed once, I've played in the pit, and I've conducted the pit. 
NO ONE in our organization is ever paid - not the directors, the actors, or musicians - everyone volunteers their time.  Paying a pianist $1000 for the run would amount to 1/6th of the budget for our musical.  Paying the musicians $20 a performance for 10 performances with an average of 9 musicians in the pit would add another $1800 - causing the pit to cost fully 1/2 of what our normal musical budget is...... and that would be impossible for us..... not to mention offensive for the director  (who easily puts the most time and effort into the production) and the actors - who get only the audiences appreaciation for their efforts.
While finding the musicians is never difficult for us - it is getting harder to line up pianists.  But the issue isn't the money - it is the time commitment.


-------------
"..that's farce, that's theater, that's life"


Posted By: redhead
Date Posted: 7/20/10 at 2:40pm
Well, just to play devil's advocate ... I've never acted in CT, but I've played piano in one show, and also played for a couple musicals.

When I contacted for the CT show, a stranger had found me by doing a google search and finding my professional website -- a website I pay money for to advertise my services.

I would think it would have been very strange and awkward had she called me and said, "I found you through your website, and we would like to hire you, but we're not actually going to pay you for your work."

I can't even imagine myself contacting a professional via their website -- an electrician, a plumber, a consultant, whatever -- and saying, "Hi, I have a job I'd like you to do, but I'm not going to pay you."

And then to get offended or indignant because they expect to be paid if they take the job?!??

So, that's how it seems from my point of view.

I will say that I get paid MUCH MUCH less through CT than I normally charge.

Oh, I think in another thread somebody said that the musicians shouldn't get paid because they just show up the last week. Don't forget that they have probably been spending several weeks learning the music, even though you haven't actually seen them doing it.

Anyway, I'm not trying to start an argument or anything. I am, however, a bit amused when people post that they can't believe the musicians would have the gall to expect to be paid! Um, why wouldn't I be expect to be paid for a job I performed??

Redhead
(ducking)


Posted By: David McCall
Date Posted: 7/20/10 at 3:03pm
In many community theaters the actors actually pay for the privilege of being in the show, they also sell tickets and come up with sponsors to put in the program. In addition they have to rehearse and deal with pretty questionable directors on occasion, for months. They also have to learn all of their lines rather than just reading it off of the page with a 40 watt blackout killer to boot.

So, your point has been taken, but I just don't understand why you would think it to be so out of the realm of reality that a musician could come in and do his/her part for a CT show as an unpaid volunteer.


-------------
David M


Posted By: redhead
Date Posted: 7/20/10 at 4:08pm
Originally posted by David McCall


So, your point has been taken, but I just don't understand why you would think it to be so out of the realm of reality that a musician could come in and do his/her part for a CT show as an unpaid volunteer.



Oh, I don't think it's outside the realm of reality. Apparently many musicians do it. Perhaps most do? I don't have enough experience to know. If that's how a person wants to donate their time and services, they certainly have a right to.

But I do think it's slightly amusing/slightly aggravating when people think the idea of paying a musician is outrageous. Don't you normally pay trained professionals who provide services for you? I can't imagine someone saying, astounded, "That plumber who fixed my toilets wants to be paid!" as if that was some nerve of him.

I have never been asked to play for a musical for free. If I were asked, I would consider it, but probably decline. (When I was younger, I probably would have done it.) A show just takes too many hours away from my family -- and disrupts their lives too much -- for me to justify doing it for no compensation.

Also, I would be somewhat concerned that doing a project that huge on a  volunteer basis would give me an air of looking/seeming less professional. This is my field, and not something I do just because I'm bored or need to get out of the house or something. It's hard enough for people in general to realize that, so I would at least consider that aspect when making a decision of whether or not to do a show for free.

Your comment about actors sometimes paying to be in the show is an interesting one, and I think gives the reason why (sometimes, at least) musicians are paid, but actors are not.

When I was contacted for one show, in particular, the MD said that she had been on the phone with at least ten other pianists already, and NO ONE was available for the week of the show! I was hired for that show, and another, on the basis of the fact that I was able and willing. They had never met me and had never heard me play. A definite contrast between actors auditioning -- and perhaps even paying -- to hope for the privilege to be in the show. Just a supply and demand thing.

Thanks for letting me elaborate on that more.

Redhead




Posted By: tristanrobin
Date Posted: 7/21/10 at 7:27am
It's usually a matter of supply and demand.

There are, most often, any number of people ready to jump up on the stage and perform.

The numbers of capable people to play in the orchestras/pit bands are considerably smaller.

Though most people are more-than-willing to have a less-than-stellar person in the leading role in a play, they do NOT want to hear a less-than-stellar performance from a musical instrument. I understand that. Bad music hurts!

When you want the best, that means professional. And, professional means paying.


-------------
http://tristanrobin.blogspot.com


Posted By: FFootlighters
Date Posted: 7/21/10 at 1:27pm

The CT I work with currently pays $25/rehearsal and $35/ show. Typical contract covers two orchestra-only rehearsals with the MD, four dress rehearsal with the cast, and 6 performances over two weekends. So, approximately $360 per musician. May seem a lot, but we only produce one musical a year.


I was with another CT that paid $35/rehearsal and $50/performance for two or three weekends of performances.
 
I've directed 10 musicals over the past 15 years and only one had an all-volunteer orchestra...the worst mistake I ever made. Most were rusty on their instruments, to put it kindly, or high school students so that the cast was upstaged by all the missed notes, honking and squeeking. Further, two of the better musicians just up and left the second weekend because...they got paying gigs!
 
I have a MFA in directing, so I grit my teeth when musicians expect to be paid stating their years of study, etc. Truly, I understand the feelings posted here that we should all be doing this for the love of community theatre. But, the reality is that good musicians expect to be paid.



-------------
Fairfield Footlighters
Fairfield, OH
http://www.fairfield-footlighters.org


Posted By: tristanrobin
Date Posted: 7/22/10 at 10:52am
Originally posted by FFootlighters

I have a MFA in directing, so I grit my teeth when musicians expect to be paid stating their years of study, etc. Truly, I understand the feelings posted here that we should all be doing this for the love of community theatre. But, the reality is that good musicians expect to be paid.


I have the same degree - and I expect to be paid, too.

Nobody is going to get rich working for community theatres. But, when you are a skilled, experienced, professional in demand, there is no reason you should not be respected with an honorarium of some sort.


-------------
http://tristanrobin.blogspot.com


Posted By: David McCall
Date Posted: 7/22/10 at 11:18am
<>
I completely understand both positions. I used to do a lot of work for free, but I've found that some groups really don't appreciate volunteers very much. Being that I have been working in production (theater, television, concerts, etc.) since I was a youngster (over 50 years of production related work) I've decided to back off from doing volunteerism especially for organizations that do have some money.. 


-------------
David M



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums version 8.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2006 Web Wiz Guide - http://www.webwizguide.info