Print Page | Close Window

stealing the scene

Printed From: Community Theater Green Room
Category: Producing Theater
Forum Name: Directing
Forum Discription: For questions about handling shows, actors, crew, board members, children ...or do we repeat ourselves?
URL: http://www.communitytheater.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2207
Printed Date: 11/23/24 at 2:33pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 8.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: stealing the scene
Posted By: GoldCanyonLady
Subject: stealing the scene
Date Posted: 1/11/07 at 8:55am
Is it absolutely against the rules to have an actor walk or do something while another actor is speaking? What are the exceptions? Please and thank you.
Barb


-------------
Barb Hofmeister,
MountainBrook Village Players, Gold Canyon, Arizona.



Replies:
Posted By: Joan54
Date Posted: 1/11/07 at 9:51am
That's sort of a strange question....I mean the other actors are often doing lots of other things while some one else is talking.  It's called dialog.  I think it is up to the director to make sure that the audience is paying attention to the actor that is important for progressing the dramatic line of the play.

-------------
"behind a thin wall of logic panic is waiting to stampede"


Posted By: B-M-D
Date Posted: 1/11/07 at 10:57am
First there are no "rules."   They'll all be broken at some point for various dramatic reasons that are significant to a particular show, like turning one's back to the audience.    I think we need to know what the circumstances are or if it's a case of an over zealous actor.

-------------
BD

"Dying is easy, comedy is hard."


Posted By: red diva
Date Posted: 1/11/07 at 12:41pm
As long as the other actors don't pull focus from where it should be, there's nothing wrong with it.  It's up to the director to observe and make that decision.

-------------
"I've worked long and hard to earn the right to be called Diva!"


Posted By: Topper
Date Posted: 1/11/07 at 4:56pm

It's only a problem when the actor who's moving is drawing attention  away (either purposely or unintentionally) from the actor who's speaking. 

Of course, it depends which is more important to the flow of the story -- sometimes the action is more important than the dialog.
 
And sometimes it's done for comic effect, where the dialog is mere filler to the wildly distracting actions of another character.  The audience is laughing too hard at the sight gag to even HEAR the other actors speaking.


-------------
"None of us really grow up. All we ever do is learn how to behave in public." -- Keith Johnstone


Posted By: Nanette
Date Posted: 1/11/07 at 9:12pm
Originally posted by red diva

As long as the other actors don't pull focus from where it should be, there's nothing wrong with it.  It's up to the director to observe and make that decision.
I fully agree!  I recently produced a show where there was an entire scene change happening directly behind the actress speaking, but because it was properly rehearsed/choreographed, and the actress kept the attention of the audience on her, there was no problem what-so-ever (although I did catch a few audience members wondering if they could hire the cast to help them when they moved LOL).


-------------
In a world of margarine, be butter!


Posted By: GoldCanyonLady
Date Posted: 1/14/07 at 10:15am
Thanks, I feel better going with my gut reaction. I am not a trained director, and my assistant this year has done a lot of acting and has much more experience than I do. As I was blocking, he noticed one actor pacing, and told me that it shouldn't be done. I thought it looked good for that part in the play. I just wanted some other's advice before I cut it out. Now I won't.



-------------
Barb Hofmeister,
MountainBrook Village Players, Gold Canyon, Arizona.



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums version 8.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2006 Web Wiz Guide - http://www.webwizguide.info