Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search Help | |
Register Login |
Polls | |
Community Theater Green Room Discussion Board :About the Community Theater Green Room :Polls |
Topic: offensive language( Topic Closed) | |
<< Prev Page of 2 |
Author | Message |
Rorgg
Celebrity Joined: 2/10/09 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 151 |
Posted: 2/27/09 at 4:19pm |
Funny, we touched on this subject last week while discussing an upcoming show of one-acts. One the one hand is a very short comedy that has a character drop the f-bomb once (maybe twice?) during a 4-way crosstalk where everyone's yelling. During the auditions, you couldn't make out what anyone was saying.
The directors decided for that reason to ASK permission of the playwright to modify it, since it really isn't necessary.
On the other hand, the longer piece we're doing has 5 of them in it, but they're really just a piece of art and nothing else conveys the same reaction (4 in a row), so the director of that piece never even considered it.
|
|
IP Logged | |
Chris Polo
Admin Group Community Theater Green Room Joined: 10/01/03 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 166 |
Posted: 3/07/09 at 1:36pm |
Tristan, I'm totally with you on this one; like some others here, different directors in our theater have changed language, but it's something I don't believe I've ever done as a director. I've certainly inadvertently rewritten lines as an actress, particularly as I've gotten older, but never deliberately as a director!
Interestingly enough, I just finished working as a consulting director (in our theater, that's an experienced director who works with anyone directing with us for the first time) on "As Bees in Honey Drown." If you're not familiar with the show, the F-bomb is dropped on page 3 and continues to be used extensively throughout, along with several other "naughty words," plus the hero is a gay man who thinks he's fallen in love with a woman, only to find his true life partner -- another gay man - by the end of the show.
We're in a small conservative community as well, so the board was understandably apprehensive about allowing him to do this show but didn't have a lot of choice, as very few directors had stepped up to the plate this season. Everyone essentially gritted their teeth and resigned themselves to very small houses (with a few less patrons by the end of each performance than had originally walked through the doors at the start of the evening), probably a few angry letters from offended patrons, and possibly some coward who didn't want to sign their name calling in to the local paper's anonymous "sound-off" column.
A few people walked out before the end of the first act on opening night, but we could tell that everyone else was enjoying it from the general audience response throughout the evening. Even so, the director and I were stunned when we heard the audience going "awww" and applauding when the gay couple wound up together, as well as by the wild applause at curtain call.
We saw the same thing every night through the run of the show, with the exception of the walkouts -- there were no more after the first performance. One regular patron, a very religious man in his 70's who is also a local newspaper columnist, saw it opening night, and yes, he used his column to chide us for putting it on. Probably in response to his column, we started receiving letters and emails from others who'd seen the show -- in fact, more than we've ever received in response to any show that I can remember, and I've been there for almost 20 years. Every one of them was positive, raving about what a different, wonderful show it had been and how much they'd enjoyed it. We even had the pleasure of seeing the local columnist issue a retraction and point out that his opinion had not been the norm, as several of his family members who had loved the show had jumped him for what he'd written about it.
I think every now and then, a theater needs to stick its neck out and test the waters to see what their audiences will tolerate. We're not about to offer a steady diet of edgy, profanity-laden shows, but I think we learned that our audiences are not as stodgy as we think we are, and that if a really good show is worth doing, it can be left intact and done as the writer intended it to be done.
|
|
Chris Polo
Visit Community Theater Green Room Originals at www.cafepress.com/ctgr "The scenery in the play was beautiful, but the actors got in front of it." -- Alexander Woolcott |
|
IP Logged | |
tristanrobin
Celebrity Joined: 4/25/05 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 704 |
Posted: 3/07/09 at 9:47pm |
well, where have you been? I haven't seen you post in quite a while!
|
|
IP Logged | |
VPA1
Star Joined: 10/20/06 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 54 |
Posted: 4/02/09 at 3:23pm |
My, I'm honored to have Ms. Polo respond to this issue. Thank you for your pov, and yours as well Tristan. Interesting to note that over 80% of the respondents to this question favor adapting language to one extent or another.
Three years ago, I took over as AD for our CT. We were $27K in debt. The CT was going bankrupt, our board was making personal loans to cover the debt. We were on the verge of going under. I took over and, along with our treasurer who shared my vision, changed the way we do business. More family friendly shows, no cutting edge stuff and adapt offensive language when called for. In short, I paid attention to our community and what they were telling us by their letters, their attendance and their patronage. I kept the COMMUNITY first in Community Theater. That is the fundamental difference between my predecessor and myself. Now, and you may choose to believe this or not, we are out of debt and we have funds in the bank in excess of 6 figures. We are on the verge of expansion to a new performing arts building and our horizon is bright. Our community loves us and we are stronger than we have been in 34 seasons of community theater. A person may argue the relative merits of changing offensive language, whether it offends the playwright, or is illegal or not, or whatever. What is not arguable is that instead of being buried in debt and on the verge of total collapse, our CT now thrives. |
|
IP Logged | |
Pandora
Walk-On Joined: 10/01/07 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
Posted: 4/17/09 at 7:50pm |
Sorry, but I'm a high school theater director who has done lots of shows myself where I used language that I wouldn't use in real life, yet would not use those same words on the high school stage. I tell my kids that i am violating our contract by changing, but that part of understanding relationships and dealing with others is understanding appropriateness. Our high school presents shows that our community expects to be entertainment for the family, including the four-year-olds who are old enough to sit through the performance. We did Footloose without a four-letter word and the audience loved it, and my kids understood that we were changing words to avoid offending the community. We did Music Man and changed "by-God stubborn" to gosh-darn stubborn." Yep, they may be baking me files in jail, but I will continue to both change language and to explain to my kids why I do it.
|
|
IP Logged | |
<< Prev Page of 2 |
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |