Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search Help | |
Register Login |
Directing | |
Community Theater Green Room Discussion Board :Producing Theater :Directing |
Topic: Theater boards and casting decisions | |
Page of 2 Next >> |
Author | Message |
NDTENOR
Star Joined: 1/18/11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 49 |
Topic: Theater boards and casting decisions Posted: 2/05/11 at 4:34pm |
A two part question:
1) As a director, should the choice of who you cast be in any way affected by members of the board of directors of the theater or influenced by others having some influence in the theater. 2) As a director,are there any circumstances where you would base casting decisions on factors which have nothing to do with a persons ability and talent that was demonstrated at the audition? And what might these be? |
|
IP Logged | |
edh915
Celebrity Joined: 11/19/09 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 325 |
Posted: 2/05/11 at 10:22pm |
Sounds like a trick question, but I'll bite...
1) If you're saying should I choose a particular actor simply because they have political or personal connections with a person of influence within the theatre group, or choose a particular actor because a person of influence within the group has indicated that they would like me to; I would reply with an emphatic no. It's never happened to me, and I would never allow it to. I could never direct any show for anyone under those circumstances. If I don't have integrity, then I have nothing. 2) The only circumstance I can think of that might influence my decision to cast someone exclusive of what I've seen at auditions would be if I were warned against that particular actor as being unreliable or disruptive. And even then I wouldn't just take one person's word for it. If I have first-hand knowledge, based on past experience, that the actor is difficult to work with, then no amount of persuasion would convince me to give the actor another try. In that respect I'm afraid I am like Mr. Darcy. "My good opinion, once lost, is lost forever." |
|
IP Logged | |
Majicwrench
Celebrity Joined: 2/07/07 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 178 |
Posted: 2/05/11 at 11:14pm |
Indeed could be a trick, but discussion is good.
I can certainly see casting someone for reasons other than just the audition. Theatre does not live in a vacuum, and yes, I consider things other than just the audition. I have a young lady I use often, she is a wonderful actress, punctual and polite. The fact that she has a huge family and they all suport the theatre is not lost on me and does influence my decisions concerning her roles.
That said, if someone, say from a board of directors, tried TELLING me who and whom not to cast, that would not go over well with me.
I firmly believe in supporting the people who support me.
|
|
IP Logged | |
PaulyWally
Player Joined: 2/03/11 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 28 |
Posted: 2/05/11 at 11:15pm |
1) Your question may sound pretty basic, but I don't believe that we can foresee every possible scenario. I have been involved in some productions where the "rules" were bent because someone had some kind of influence... and the results were often very positive.
I just think it all depends on the situation. One thing for sure, I don't think the director should direct differently or show any sort of favoritism once rehearsals start. The cast loses respect for the director, and the actor hijacks the production. 2) See #1. The director's job responsibilities are not static. And as a leader, s/he will have to make tough decisions with imperfect data. Having a loose policy is not the enemy (nor is having strict policies)... it is the way a leader handles conflict that inevitably determines the morale and respect of the team, and the success of the production. |
|
IP Logged | |
NDTENOR
Star Joined: 1/18/11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 49 |
Posted: 2/06/11 at 2:07pm |
Look.... I appreciate the candor in the responses so far and , to me , there is no "right" or "wrong" answer. But even in three responses there are differences in interpretation and philosophy of this question and I understand that differences in philosophy exist.
My only qualm, as an actor, has to do with the appropriate and constructive use of my personal time to attend an audition which can sometimes take 2 or 3 hours. If , for instance , I could only attend one of three auditions given by the above different directors then obviously it would be, if I knew something about their "philosophy" before hand , to my advantage to attend the audition of edh915. And if I could attend more than one then it might or might not be my choice to attend the other two. I guess over the years it has just become more and more irksome to attend some auditions that , essentially, were a waste of time to attend. Time is a very precious commodity. |
|
IP Logged | |
PaulyWally
Player Joined: 2/03/11 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 28 |
Posted: 2/06/11 at 2:31pm |
I think your frustrations are fair. But I also look at it like this: 1) Time is certainly a very precious commodity... especially for actors that have to hold down another full-time job so they may act. But your time is also what you make of it. I don't know a single actor that doesn't need practice auditioning. If you spend time at an audition thinking it's a waste, then I doubt you'll learn anything from it and then it will be a waste. 2) Auditioning is one way actors advertise themselves. But it's not the only way. And the more involved an actor gets in their local scene, the more contacts they make, and the more opportunity to use networking as an advertising tool instead of just auditioning. And if your time really is that precious, then maybe you can also find more productive ways to get your name out there. The bottomline is, luck favors the object in motion. If you are doing the bare minimum by only attending auditions, then you will see minimum results. Successful actors market themselves well. They use every possible influence they have to gain work and experience. And if that means getting their foot in the door by utilizing a board member, then that's what it means. Sorry if this doesn't jive with your philosophy. But that's how it is in the world. And it only gets worse the higher you go up the ladder. |
|
IP Logged | |
Majicwrench
Celebrity Joined: 2/07/07 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 178 |
Posted: 2/06/11 at 6:22pm |
I wouldn't want you to think that I hold auditions and have already pre-cast part. If I am holding auditions for particular parts, you can bet it is not pre-cast. I am not fond of auditions and if I could pre-cast everybody I would, and then just skip auditioning.
. BUT if I have two actors, both give good readings, look the part, seem like good people, and one is a board members son/daughter (just for an example) that will weigh in on my decision.
Keith
|
|
IP Logged | |
NDTENOR
Star Joined: 1/18/11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 49 |
Posted: 2/07/11 at 8:42am |
Well... I'd like to hear what edh195 might say about the previous comments.
Look... my take is this is as follows. Casting bias ( I don't really like the term pre-casting ) is a very "slippery slope" which ultimately leads to overall poorer quality productions. I'm not saying bad productions. I'm just saying poorer quality productions. One of the reasons is that the "word" gets around,( as theater people are know to talk), and you get fewer people showing up for auditions. And because of this less of a "talent pool" to choose from. And the quality of shows suffer. But then again.... some people really don't care. At least where I live there are quit a few community theaters to choose from. I would much prefer auditioning for a group where I had some chance than a group for which I had little or no chance. |
|
IP Logged | |
Rorgg
Celebrity Joined: 2/10/09 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 151 |
Posted: 2/07/11 at 5:29pm |
Obviously, there's some actual situation here. I'll just try to address this generally:
1. You actually have two questions here. The first one is, should it be affected by members of the board. And here, I'll say... maybe, see my answer to number 2. Your second question is, should it be affected by who has influence, and I'll say no. 2. Yes. As a director, I want the best people for the part. And, as such, I will be led by what I learn from the auditions plus any other information germane to the decision. Let me give a couple examples that are relevant, and not all too uncommon: * A while back, I was directing a one-act as part of a night of such, and we did a combined audition, because some actors would end up cast in multiple roles across shows. The general course was simply to do cold readings, and there was one fellow who gave a pretty bad cold read. Despite this, he ended up cast in 3 of the 4 shows. Why? Because we knew he could act -- he'd been in a previous production, at which he'd given a similarly bad read, but got cast anyway just due to lack of alternatives, and gave a good performance ... and we all knew this tale. * In my last directing gig, at the end of auditions, I sat down with my AD and SM (who sat in on the audition). We had 3 medium-to-large parts and 3 women of a similar age with sufficient talent to fill the roles. In discussing the choice with them, we placed one of the three, and were left with two for two spots. I favored one girl for the larger role based on the read she gave for it, but she'd given an inferior read for another part, and based on that the AD and SM were of the opposite opinion, and I thought they made good points. Here's where #1 comes in. I called in the producer, who'd worked with both of them before and asked for her opinion -- she'd been working the door, and hadn't seen the audition, but I needed MORE information. And she gave some valuable insight on both of them that helped make the decision, and given the outcome, helped make the RIGHT decision. So... yes. You have the last word on this, and in no way should you give this up (this is part of the reason I won't co-direct again ... the casting session drove me up a wall ... casting's a painful enough experience when you only have to fight your own mind). However, you shouldn't be afraid to take other information into account if you think it will help you make your decision, and sometimes, board members and the like can be a valuable aid in that. |
|
IP Logged | |
NDTENOR
Star Joined: 1/18/11 Online Status: Offline Posts: 49 |
Posted: 2/07/11 at 11:46pm |
Mr. Rorgg:
Thank you for your opinion and I appreciate your comment. But obviously there is a big difference between getting other peoples " unbiased" opinion about an audition and one which is "affected" by factors which have no particular connection to the persons ability to perform a particular role. If you can get others opinions on an audition which are fair and unbiased then I think that is a perfectly wonderful thing to do. Two or three heads are sometimes better than one. But just how sure are you of that? |
|
IP Logged | |
Page of 2 Next >> |
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |