Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search Help | |
Register Login |
Running Your Theater | |
Community Theater Green Room Discussion Board :Theater Administration :Running Your Theater |
Topic: Director/Producer relationship?( Topic Closed) | |
Author | Message |
jayzehr
Celebrity Joined: 8/11/05 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 537 |
Topic: Director/Producer relationship? Posted: 5/08/09 at 5:08pm |
Does anyone here have things set-up so that the producer or perhaps the board or Artistic Director have the final authority over what happens with a production?
|
|
IP Logged | |
imamember
Celebrity Joined: 8/18/08 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 121 |
Posted: 5/09/09 at 2:46pm |
I guess it depends on the situation but for us the show's director has final say, but within guidelines like reality and budget.
|
|
IP Logged | |
Nanette
Celebrity Joined: 8/01/06 Online Status: Offline Posts: 399 |
Posted: 5/10/09 at 8:26am |
Our show's director has final say over what happens with a production.
|
|
In a world of margarine, be butter!
|
|
IP Logged | |
jayzehr
Celebrity Joined: 8/11/05 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 537 |
Posted: 5/10/09 at 3:52pm |
Thanks. That's how we've been doing it as well. Just wanted to see if there were other arrangements that were successful for folks.
|
|
IP Logged | |
PWProducer
Walk-On Joined: 8/01/07 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 0 |
Posted: 5/10/09 at 9:51pm |
Well, the way we have it set up is that ultimately the Producers do have the final say. But we have only used that authority maybe once or twice and it had to do with a cast member acting/doing something that in our opinion was totally out of line and endangered our reputation. When it comes to the artistic vision of the show and casting it always is the directors decision.
|
|
IP Logged | |
KEB54
Celebrity Joined: 7/24/08 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 227 |
Posted: 5/14/09 at 10:51am |
The show's director has final say for 99% of things. However, the Producer always has the right and duty to insist on changes if something is going to hurt the company or an individual.
Mostly the Producer will give non-artistic advice to help the decission-making of the director, such as remind him of budget constraints.
|
|
KEB
|
|
IP Logged | |
dboris
Celebrity Joined: 2/10/04 Online Status: Offline Posts: 124 |
Posted: 5/14/09 at 12:57pm |
In my theatre the Producer would have final say on some decisions especially those that would impact budget, theatre policies or operating procedures. For example the Directory might make a creative decision that he wants certain costumes for the show, but if this would push the show over budget then it's the Producer's responsibility to challenge that decision. Fortunately in my group the Directors and Producers normally work well together so it shouldn't ever come down to the Producer having to absolutely forbid something, some sort of comprimise would be worked out.
|
|
IP Logged | |
John Luzaich
Celebrity Joined: 2/24/08 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 174 |
Posted: 5/15/09 at 5:53pm |
It's my experience that many good theatres are run by benchmarking, by looking at "best practices" and then trying to fit things to our own situation, our own needs. If you look at professional theatre of producing a Broadway play and then take what we can and make it our own, use some of the principles for our own needs. In a Broadway show, the producer is the boss. Without getting too grandiose with exagerated examples with multi-million dollar budgets and many producers and associate producers, etc. But, for basic purposes to keep it simple: the producer is the general partner that raises all of the money. The producer gets 50% and is called the general partner of the corporation. All of the investors split the other 50% (depending on their investment) and they become the limited partners. The producer is the boss and starts the process. He or she buys the option of producing the play from the author(s) and the producer hires everyone: director, designers, stage manager, ad agency, negotiates deal with theatre, the producer is the overall boss. Some times the producer fires the director and brings in someone else, but the producer has final say over everything. Now, go to a school produced play example: the director is the boss and whatever he or she says goes because they run everything and there usually is no producer. The conflict with community theatres is there is no right or wrong example because we live somewhere in between those two situations. Some of us have a producer and for other community theatres, the theatre organization and board and committee, etc are the producer. I think for many organizations, the problem lies in setting the expectation clearly from the beginning of who is responsible for what. We've had some newer directors that are very good at directing and blocking and working with actors, but they are used to more control over everything, that includes marketing, etc. The friction starts when they want more say or more control over areas that traditionally are not under a director domain.
It's an interesting process and we need to constantly re-evaluate and change and have things agreed upon and written down and clearly communicated before the process starts anew. Sometimes that's difficult because many people are overworked and going from one thing to another and are time short.
John
|
|
John
cfct@cfu.net http://www.osterregent.org http://www.facebook.com/osterregent |
|
IP Logged | |
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |